One complete experiment from the Brand Voice Agent. Built by Abhinandan Tejaswi.
Work sample for AI Content & Copywriting Head · BCCL
AI drafts in locked brand voice. Humans keep taste.
This page documents one full run: public voice constraints in, brief in, three distinct options out, a human choice, directed feedback, and a revised draft. Outputs were captured from this package's offline generator (case-run.json), not invented for the page.
Not affiliated with BCCL, Times of India, or Bennett, Coleman & Co. Brand guidelines below are a public synthesis from reported campaign language. This is not an internal BCCL brand book.
Prashish More and BCCL creative leadership need proof that an AI content system can stay inside a news brand's voice: calm over clutter, journalism over brochure, no invented facts. This run uses Times of India's publicly reported "In with the News, Out with the Noise" campaign spirit as constraints, then shows the full draft-judge-revise loop an editor would actually run.
Locked voice + pasted guidelines as hard constraints
Three meaningfully different angles (not paraphrases), with short punchy headlines
Human choice, or None of these to reject patterns and regenerate a fresh round
Headline chips + free-text feedback before any "final"
Prior vs revised compare so taste can see the delta
Inputs
Times of India
Format: Social post · Experiment: Weekend social for TOI readers
Public voice constraints used for this experiment (not an internal BCCL brand book)
Prefer verified news over forwards, spin, and studio shouting
Calm, credible, compass-like tone; cut through clutter, do not add to it
Journalistic language over marketing brochure language
No invented facts, statistics, or event names
Plain English; lead with the human stake
No emoji; under 80 words for social; warmth over hard sell
Tagline spirit: "In with the news, out with the noise"
Synthesis draws on publicly reported statements and campaign framing associated with Sivakumar Sundaram / Kaustuv Chatterjee as covered in media. Not claimed as an internal bible.
Brief · Weekend social for TOI readers
Format
Social post
Audience
urban Indian professionals 28-45
CTA
Start your Sunday with the Times.
Promote Times of India's weekend reading habit for people drowning in WhatsApp forwards. Angle: one calm Sunday morning with the paper (or TOI app) as an antidote to noisy group chats. Audience: urban Indian professionals 28-45. CTA: Start your Sunday with the Times. Do not invent a specific news story or statistic.
Three options (A / B / C)
Captured from generateOptionsOffline() in this codebase with the inputs above. Headlines are short and punchy; bodies open as sentences (no double headline).
Option AHuman stake
Sunday, without the group chat.
You open the phone and the group chat is already loud.
A slower Sunday with Times of India puts the human stake first: what changed, why it matters to you, without the pile-on. Built for urban Indian professionals 28-45.
Start your Sunday with the Times.
Why it fits voiceMatches TOI's approachable authority by putting the reader first. Fits a social post format. Guidelines noted: no emoji; warm human framing.
Risk noteRisk: may feel soft if the brief needs harder sell or sharper claim.
Option BAuthority frameChosen
Less noise. More news.
There is a cleaner way to start the weekend.
Times of India tracks the essentials, drops the filler, and keeps the line curious. Written for urban Indian professionals 28-45 who want signal they can act on.
Start your Sunday with the Times.
Why it fits voiceKeeps the Times clarity bar: confident framing without hype. Fits a social post format. Guidelines noted: no emoji; warm human framing.
Risk noteRisk: can read formal; watch warmth if the brand card asks for approachable.
Option CCultural pulse
The quiet Sunday habit.
Across the country, Sundays still ask for a slower read.
Catch the everyday pulse without the pile-on. Times of India keeps it useful for urban Indian professionals 28-45.
Start your Sunday with the Times.
Why it fits voiceTaps shared national mood while staying conversational, not chatty. Fits a social post format. Guidelines noted: no emoji; warm human framing.
Risk noteRisk: cultural timing can date quickly; keep facts generic unless verified.
Product note: if none fit, None of these opens reject chips (off-voice, soft, salesy, generic, boring headlines, too long, wrong format) plus an optional note, then regenerates Round 2+ while keeping brand lock and brief.
Choice + feedback
Human selected Option B (Authority frame), then directed the rewrite with headline-aware chips.
punchier headlineless salesy
Cut the soft open. Lead with the human stake in line one. Keep the noise vs news contrast. No emoji.
Prior vs revised
Same generator's reviseOffline() pass. Headline chips changed the headline, not only the body. Prior stays visible so taste can compare, not guess.
Prior · Option B
Less noise. More news.
There is a cleaner way to start the weekend.
Times of India tracks the essentials, drops the filler, and keeps the line curious. Written for urban Indian professionals 28-45 who want signal they can act on.
Start your Sunday with the Times.
Revised · after feedback
News first. Forwards later.
The group chat is already loud. You want the news, not the noise.
Times of India tracks the essentials, drops the filler, and keeps the line curious. Written for urban Indian professionals 28-45 who want signal they can act on.
Start your Sunday with the Times.
Why this revisionRevised against human feedback (punchier headline, less salesy headline, dialed back sell, applied free-text direction, led with human stake, kept noise vs news contrast, enforced no emoji). Still locked to Times of India voice.
What this proves for AI Content & Copywriting Head
Voice lock is product, not prompt theater. Brand card + pasted public constraints shape drafts and risk notes.
Options earn their keep. Human stake / authority / cultural pulse differ in angle. None of these lets an editor reject patterns and pull a fresh round without losing brand lock.
Taste stays human. Choice, headline chips, and free-text feedback drive the revise; nothing auto-publishes.
Compare is the honesty layer. Prior vs revised makes the editorial delta visible for stakeholders.
Honest about sources. Public campaign synthesis only; ready to swap in a real internal brand book under NDA.